http://acportalstorm.com/w/mw/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Turbine_Games_Q%26A%2FDungeons%2FQ-04Turbine Games Q&A/Dungeons/Q-04 - Revision history2026-06-05T17:55:17ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.35.0http://acportalstorm.com/w/mw/index.php?title=Turbine_Games_Q%26A/Dungeons/Q-04&diff=213807&oldid=prev127.0.0.1 at 20:44, 19 December 20202020-12-19T20:44:40Z<p></p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>{{Turbine Games Q&A<br />
| Link = <nowiki>http://www.turbinegames.com/qa/view_questions.html?id=701</nowiki><br />
| Title = Has there been any discussion on adding *Huge* dungeons<br />
| Text =<br />
{{Turbine Games Q&A Question<br />
| Asked = 2000.11.01<br />
| Player = Sarec of FrostFell<br />
| Title = Has there been any discussion on adding *Huge* dungeons<br />
| Category = Dungeons<br />
| Question = Have you guys at Turbine considered large scale dungeons in the vein of Angband and Nethack with large RNG generated dungeons?<br /><br />Or possibly just massive dungeons designed by hand with tricks and traps such as secret walls you need to jump to pass through and random portals to other spots in it.<br />A dungeon of such gruesome nature and complexity that the whole may be unexplored for months would be intriguing to high levels that have 'seen it all'<br />
| Answered = 2000.11.01<br />
| Dev = Jason Booth<br />
| Answer = The larger the dungeon, the longer it takes to pre-process through the pipeline. The pit, for instance, takes about 30 hours to go through the pipe once it's ready to integrate into the world.<br /><br />Additionally, there are server concerns with large numbers of players in a single dungeon that have to be considered.<br /><br />We could do the type of thing you're talking about, but to keep performance up we'd need to split the dungeon into several sections that can be portaled to a from.<br />
}}<br />
}}</div>127.0.0.1